Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Camera Fun" data-source="post: 826137" data-attributes="member: 13006">Been basically happy with the 24-70 f4 except for always wanting more focal length. Having an f2.8 option would be nice but f4 version is acceptable. Also, based on what I'm really shooting (objects, people, events, etc.) at this time, it's really best for me have just one lens instead of two lenses. So here is where I stand now.&nbsp;&nbsp; Tamron 35-150 f2.8; Good range &amp; good reviews BUT heavy so I don't see it as a good walk around lens.&nbsp;&nbsp; Nikon 70-180 f2.8; Good upper range &amp; acceptable weight BUT would mean the need for 2 lenses.&nbsp;&nbsp; Nikon 24-120 f4; Ideal range &amp; acceptable weight BUT has mixed reviews (some say it's great, some say it's just 'good').All this has basically taken me back to the 24-120 f4 but some of the reviews cause doubts.&nbsp; So what are 24-120 f4 users thoughts at this time on its image quality?&nbsp; Thanks.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Camera Fun, post: 826137, member: 13006"] Been basically happy with the 24-70 f4 except for always wanting more focal length. Having an f2.8 option would be nice but f4 version is acceptable. Also, based on what I'm really shooting (objects, people, events, etc.) at this time, it's really best for me have just one lens instead of two lenses. So here is where I stand now. Tamron 35-150 f2.8; Good range & good reviews BUT heavy so I don't see it as a good walk around lens. Nikon 70-180 f2.8; Good upper range & acceptable weight BUT would mean the need for 2 lenses. Nikon 24-120 f4; Ideal range & acceptable weight BUT has mixed reviews (some say it's great, some say it's just 'good'). All this has basically taken me back to the 24-120 f4 but some of the reviews cause doubts. So what are 24-120 f4 users thoughts at this time on its image quality? Thanks. [/QUOTE]

Verification