Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vapiano" data-source="post: 230052" data-attributes="member: 9597">My bad, I thought not being a variable lens determined this, I know the 70-200 on a DX is 105-300mm. The TC 1.4 would take away some of the range? Still learning here. Thanks.Thanks, I am kind of a label whore and like Nikons lenses; I will take a look into the Sigma. I typically shoot from 40 yards and in, mostly birds at the feeder, deer and other wild life near the woods out back. I was only thinking of getting a TC because of not getting a great shot of a Red Shouldered Hawk over the weekend. Still bummed about it. I truly believe the 70-200 would make the most sense. I may rent the 80-400 this weekend from a local B&amp;M to see how it performs before making a final decision.Not at all, I wanted to get as many opinions as possible. Thank you.Here are some pics that I took recently. I believe the last shot would have been better with a 70-200 with the better glass after post crop processing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vapiano, post: 230052, member: 9597"] My bad, I thought not being a variable lens determined this, I know the 70-200 on a DX is 105-300mm. The TC 1.4 would take away some of the range? Still learning here. Thanks. Thanks, I am kind of a label whore and like Nikons lenses; I will take a look into the Sigma. I typically shoot from 40 yards and in, mostly birds at the feeder, deer and other wild life near the woods out back. I was only thinking of getting a TC because of not getting a great shot of a Red Shouldered Hawk over the weekend. Still bummed about it. I truly believe the 70-200 would make the most sense. I may rent the 80-400 this weekend from a local B&M to see how it performs before making a final decision. Not at all, I wanted to get as many opinions as possible. Thank you. Here are some pics that I took recently. I believe the last shot would have been better with a 70-200 with the better glass after post crop processing. [/QUOTE]

Verification