Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Eduard" data-source="post: 361256" data-attributes="member: 986">Ran across a very interesting <a href="http://blog.jarviedigital.com/selling-all-my-nikon-stuff/" target="_blank">blog post</a> by Scott Jarvie. I won't ruin the entire article but he has decided to change his reliance on Nikon lenses pretty significantly. I first read it as slightly inflammatory with a few digs at NPS. I reread it and have to agree with the majority of his points regarding price and repair costs. Then I realized that by adding a Tamron 70-200/2.8 this week to my Tamron 24-70/2.8 and Sigma 12-24, I had made a similar decision - maybe a little less dramatic though. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes&nbsp; &nbsp; :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />I thought this might cause an interesting conversation. I'm going to send Scott a note and invite him to join.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Eduard, post: 361256, member: 986"] Ran across a very interesting [url=http://blog.jarviedigital.com/selling-all-my-nikon-stuff/]blog post[/url] by Scott Jarvie. I won't ruin the entire article but he has decided to change his reliance on Nikon lenses pretty significantly. I first read it as slightly inflammatory with a few digs at NPS. I reread it and have to agree with the majority of his points regarding price and repair costs. Then I realized that by adding a Tamron 70-200/2.8 this week to my Tamron 24-70/2.8 and Sigma 12-24, I had made a similar decision - maybe a little less dramatic though. :rolleyes: I thought this might cause an interesting conversation. I'm going to send Scott a note and invite him to join. [/QUOTE]

Verification