I use a wide gamut monitor and I have never seen RAW image quality differences between any of the major software brands. I have seen differences in how the RAW file looks in their respective default modes, but I would not call that a quality difference. I can make any RAW file from any program look the way I want. It is the options and process getting it there that differs amongst the programs.
Lightroom vs Capture One
- Thread starter hulk2012
- Start date
- Status
Not raw quality but raw processed into 16 bit TIFF for example. Aperture 3 processing so far is the worst. Then Lightroom and two best professing engines are DXO Optics Pro and Capture One. In terms of UI and it's speed I think Aperture 3 beats everything hands down. However in terms of the raw processed quality -
Capture one and It's bipolar processing engine is too notch.
Please be respectful of other's opinions. The way I read Pat's post, he was in no way arrogant. We do have guidelines and if you are not careful of the way you judge other members, you will be ignored or banned.
Therefore I'm closing this thread.
Last edited:
- Status