Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Fred Kingston_RIP" data-source="post: 305454" data-attributes="member: 10742">This just my opinion... being a nerd, and software junky, I have all of them... The big difference between PS, Elements, and LR is layers... LR doesn't have layers, per se...LR is slanted more toward the photographer that wants to adjust the image... without getting into the manipulation aspects of graphics... It started life with the features a photographer needs...Elements and PS, natively started out as a graphics program that evolved over time to include photographic concepts... and is slanted more towards the graphic artist that wants to add/create a graphic image...Under the skin... coming from the same manufacturer, they all contain the same features. They're just arranged differently... Conceptually, all you need to learn/understand is the feature set... &quot;contrast, exposure, wb, cropping&quot; etc, and after that, you can find your way around any of these programs...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Fred Kingston_RIP, post: 305454, member: 10742"] This just my opinion... being a nerd, and software junky, I have all of them... The big difference between PS, Elements, and LR is layers... LR doesn't have layers, per se... LR is slanted more toward the photographer that wants to adjust the image... without getting into the manipulation aspects of graphics... It started life with the features a photographer needs... Elements and PS, natively started out as a graphics program that evolved over time to include photographic concepts... and is slanted more towards the graphic artist that wants to add/create a graphic image... Under the skin... coming from the same manufacturer, they all contain the same features. They're just arranged differently... Conceptually, all you need to learn/understand is the feature set... "contrast, exposure, wb, cropping" etc, and after that, you can find your way around any of these programs... [/QUOTE]

Verification