Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
Lightroom 4.3 and Camera RAW 7.3 Update
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eduard" data-source="post: 96280" data-attributes="member: 986"><p>There is an old thread <a href="http://nikonites.com/computers-software/2226-mastering-your-metadata-article.html" target="_blank">here</a> that briefly discussed DNG and metadata which you might find interesting. I'm firmly in the "save the original" camp. I know that DNG can embed the original NEF, but it still is a file translation. I want to save my "negative" as close to as it came out of the camera as possible.</p><p></p><p>The other point to consider is that until or if the camera manufacturers publicly document the hidden or extended EXIF fields that they use, Adobe or any other software provider is interpreting / approximating what is actually in the file. I'm not saying that they do a bad job - far from it - but it is reason enough for me to not use DNG.</p><p></p><p>Ideally, and here I absolutely agree with Adobe's intent of DNG, all camera manufacturers could agree on a standard RAW format and the industry can solve the issue. I think Nikon's software efforts to date have been mediocre. I'd rather they spend time creating my D400. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></p><p></p><p>(Okay I'm off my soapbox now.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eduard, post: 96280, member: 986"] There is an old thread [URL="http://nikonites.com/computers-software/2226-mastering-your-metadata-article.html"]here[/URL] that briefly discussed DNG and metadata which you might find interesting. I'm firmly in the "save the original" camp. I know that DNG can embed the original NEF, but it still is a file translation. I want to save my "negative" as close to as it came out of the camera as possible. The other point to consider is that until or if the camera manufacturers publicly document the hidden or extended EXIF fields that they use, Adobe or any other software provider is interpreting / approximating what is actually in the file. I'm not saying that they do a bad job - far from it - but it is reason enough for me to not use DNG. Ideally, and here I absolutely agree with Adobe's intent of DNG, all camera manufacturers could agree on a standard RAW format and the industry can solve the issue. I think Nikon's software efforts to date have been mediocre. I'd rather they spend time creating my D400. :rolleyes: (Okay I'm off my soapbox now.) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
Lightroom 4.3 and Camera RAW 7.3 Update
Top