Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3100
Lenses lenses endless dilemma
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stmv" data-source="post: 70296" data-attributes="member: 10038"><p>I have to agree, that for the DX sensor, hard to beat the 18-200 lens. A good reason why it is so popular, The awesome travel lens.</p><p></p><p>Ironically, I have the 18-200, but when I added my D7000, I personally went back to the cheapo 18-55 VR, and a 55-300VR as my light weight package. Here is the reason, the newest 18-55 is a gem for sharpness, yes, low cost, but don't throw stones at this lens, it will capture images sharply with little distortion. Best, it is so light weight that a joy versus the 18-200. I keep the 55-300 on a belt pouch, and when I need the reach, this lens holds up to the sharpness of the 18-200, but has that extra reach that I so do like. As such, my 18-200 collects dust (no I will not sell it - still handy for when I only want one lens). </p><p></p><p>In the end, no such thing as a perfect lens, which is why my shelf gets cluttered with them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stmv, post: 70296, member: 10038"] I have to agree, that for the DX sensor, hard to beat the 18-200 lens. A good reason why it is so popular, The awesome travel lens. Ironically, I have the 18-200, but when I added my D7000, I personally went back to the cheapo 18-55 VR, and a 55-300VR as my light weight package. Here is the reason, the newest 18-55 is a gem for sharpness, yes, low cost, but don't throw stones at this lens, it will capture images sharply with little distortion. Best, it is so light weight that a joy versus the 18-200. I keep the 55-300 on a belt pouch, and when I need the reach, this lens holds up to the sharpness of the 18-200, but has that extra reach that I so do like. As such, my 18-200 collects dust (no I will not sell it - still handy for when I only want one lens). In the end, no such thing as a perfect lens, which is why my shelf gets cluttered with them. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D3100
Lenses lenses endless dilemma
Top