Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Lense for photographing art
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aroy" data-source="post: 469074" data-attributes="member: 16090"><p>I would suggest a D3300 instead of the D3200. The price difference is not much but you get</p><p>. Faster processor</p><p>. More DR</p><p>. NO AA filter so colours should be better</p><p>. There are other advantages, but they do not apply in your case (faster FPS, better Video, in camera panorama etc)</p><p></p><p>Regarding colour nuances, you will never get perfect colours with most of the cameras. The reasons are many, but here are a few of them</p><p>. D3xxx series use 12 bit RAW, and the others use 14 bit RAW. In contrast the MF bodies use 15/16 bit RAW. That gives more shades to each of the primary colours, hence the nuances come out better. 12 bits = 1K, 14 bits = 16K and 16 bits = 64K shades.</p><p>. No bayer pattern sensor will reproduce colours faithfully (they are interpolated), you can come close but there is always a gap. That is why Hasselblad sells multi-shot backs, used primarily for artwork reproduction and archiving.</p><p></p><p>If your images are just for WEB, then the kit lens supplied with D3300 is fine. If you want better geometric correction (flat plane), then the Nikon 60mm Macro is your best bet. It is one of the sharpest flat plane lenses recommended for photographing flat objects - coins, stamps and paintings.</p><p></p><p>One thing that I cannot figure out is that if you are so particular about colour nuances, how do you expect your clients to appreciate them on their totally un calibrated monitors?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aroy, post: 469074, member: 16090"] I would suggest a D3300 instead of the D3200. The price difference is not much but you get . Faster processor . More DR . NO AA filter so colours should be better . There are other advantages, but they do not apply in your case (faster FPS, better Video, in camera panorama etc) Regarding colour nuances, you will never get perfect colours with most of the cameras. The reasons are many, but here are a few of them . D3xxx series use 12 bit RAW, and the others use 14 bit RAW. In contrast the MF bodies use 15/16 bit RAW. That gives more shades to each of the primary colours, hence the nuances come out better. 12 bits = 1K, 14 bits = 16K and 16 bits = 64K shades. . No bayer pattern sensor will reproduce colours faithfully (they are interpolated), you can come close but there is always a gap. That is why Hasselblad sells multi-shot backs, used primarily for artwork reproduction and archiving. If your images are just for WEB, then the kit lens supplied with D3300 is fine. If you want better geometric correction (flat plane), then the Nikon 60mm Macro is your best bet. It is one of the sharpest flat plane lenses recommended for photographing flat objects - coins, stamps and paintings. One thing that I cannot figure out is that if you are so particular about colour nuances, how do you expect your clients to appreciate them on their totally un calibrated monitors? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Lense for photographing art
Top
