Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AC016" data-source="post: 104704" data-attributes="member: 9619"><p>You know, when i first came to this forum, i was made fun of when i suggested an all-around lens.&nbsp; I was told to get a point and shoot if i did not want to bother with changing lenses all the time.&nbsp; True enough, if you are going to set out to take landscapes, then you really only need one lens.&nbsp; But, if you are going to do a walkabout and don't really know what you may be shooting, an 18-200 or an 18-270 (Tamron) is a great thing to have.&nbsp; However, keep in mind that making an all-in-one, certain sacrifices have been made.&nbsp; if you can afford it, get one of those all-in-ones - perhaps look at sigma and tamron for something more cost effective.&nbsp; The only other option is to buy another camera, lol<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="AC016, post: 104704, member: 9619"] You know, when i first came to this forum, i was made fun of when i suggested an all-around lens. I was told to get a point and shoot if i did not want to bother with changing lenses all the time. True enough, if you are going to set out to take landscapes, then you really only need one lens. But, if you are going to do a walkabout and don't really know what you may be shooting, an 18-200 or an 18-270 (Tamron) is a great thing to have. However, keep in mind that making an all-in-one, certain sacrifices have been made. if you can afford it, get one of those all-in-ones - perhaps look at sigma and tamron for something more cost effective. The only other option is to buy another camera, lol:) [/QUOTE]

Verification