Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Geoffc" data-source="post: 213756" data-attributes="member: 8705">I have the 24-120F4 and as Fish says, it spends a lot of time on my D800. I'm a picky so and so about sharpness and I'm happy with it. Pixel peeping the 24-70 2.8 has the edge but not enough for me to give up the range and low speed shots I get because of the VR. I would only get the 24-70 in addition to rather than instead of this lens.This is based on having used both.I recently shot my daughters wedding<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/teerecks/sets/72157635556569243/" target="_blank">http://www.flickr.com/photos/teerecks/sets/72157635556569243/</a> with this combo and she was happy. If I had the balls to use it for that event then it'll do for most <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Geoffc, post: 213756, member: 8705"] I have the 24-120F4 and as Fish says, it spends a lot of time on my D800. I'm a picky so and so about sharpness and I'm happy with it. Pixel peeping the 24-70 2.8 has the edge but not enough for me to give up the range and low speed shots I get because of the VR. I would only get the 24-70 in addition to rather than instead of this lens. This is based on having used both. I recently shot my daughters wedding [URL]http://www.flickr.com/photos/teerecks/sets/72157635556569243/[/URL] with this combo and she was happy. If I had the balls to use it for that event then it'll do for most :-) [/QUOTE]

Verification