Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Lens Recommendations
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 758251" data-attributes="member: 13196"><p>Fred, your link shows the original 24-120mm lens. The OP wants to upgrade to the 24-120mm f/4 VR model. I can't figure out how to compare the new version against the old on that site. Can you add that info, please? </p><p></p><p>Nikon makes the <a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/729950-USA/Nikon_2191_AF_S_NIKKOR_28_300mm_f_3_5_5_6G.html" target="_blank">28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G lens</a> that gets good reviews. And a while back Scott Kelby mentioned using the <a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1029395-REG/tamron_28_300mm_f_3_5_6_3_di_vc.html" target="_blank">Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 lens</a> as a walkabout lens. But I haven't used either so can't confirm if either is decent. </p><p></p><p>However, I do have two copies of the Nikon 24-120mm f/4 VR. Initially I wasn't sure I wanted to go with an f/4 lens (previously had a Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8). But it's a great lens that isn't heavy, and I'm very happy with the images it produces.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hark, post: 758251, member: 13196"] Fred, your link shows the original 24-120mm lens. The OP wants to upgrade to the 24-120mm f/4 VR model. I can't figure out how to compare the new version against the old on that site. Can you add that info, please? Nikon makes the [URL="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/729950-USA/Nikon_2191_AF_S_NIKKOR_28_300mm_f_3_5_5_6G.html"]28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G lens[/URL] that gets good reviews. And a while back Scott Kelby mentioned using the [URL="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1029395-REG/tamron_28_300mm_f_3_5_6_3_di_vc.html"]Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 lens[/URL] as a walkabout lens. But I haven't used either so can't confirm if either is decent. However, I do have two copies of the Nikon 24-120mm f/4 VR. Initially I wasn't sure I wanted to go with an f/4 lens (previously had a Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8). But it's a great lens that isn't heavy, and I'm very happy with the images it produces. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Lens Recommendations
Top