Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Lens questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Woodyg3" data-source="post: 702672" data-attributes="member: 24569"><p>I'd say that faster lenses tend to be sharper, too, but not because of the aperture range in and of itself. People who pay more for a lens tend to want both faster and sharper, so that tends to be the way manufacturers make decisions about their lens line-ups and designs. </p><p></p><p>As far as the Nikon 18-300, I'd stay away. I had one (f/3.5-5.6) and it was NOT a sharp lens at most focal lengths, and downright SOFT at some.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Woodyg3, post: 702672, member: 24569"] I'd say that faster lenses tend to be sharper, too, but not because of the aperture range in and of itself. People who pay more for a lens tend to want both faster and sharper, so that tends to be the way manufacturers make decisions about their lens line-ups and designs. As far as the Nikon 18-300, I'd stay away. I had one (f/3.5-5.6) and it was NOT a sharp lens at most focal lengths, and downright SOFT at some. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Lens questions
Top