Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Lens help!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DraganDL" data-source="post: 277976" data-attributes="member: 18251"><p>Yes - it is better (generally, produces <strong>slightly</strong> sharper photos across it's range and COVERS full frame sensor cameras, whereas 55-300 does not) but lacks those 15mm (not that "wide" as 55-300). If we are talking about this lens: <a href="http://goo.gl/es4W0" target="_blank">Nikon 55-300mm VR</a> </p><p></p><p>If you own a DX camera and have no intention to switch for a full frame, I suggest you to go for a 55-300mm, anyway...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DraganDL, post: 277976, member: 18251"] Yes - it is better (generally, produces [B]slightly[/B] sharper photos across it's range and COVERS full frame sensor cameras, whereas 55-300 does not) but lacks those 15mm (not that "wide" as 55-300). If we are talking about this lens: [URL="http://goo.gl/es4W0"]Nikon 55-300mm VR[/URL] If you own a DX camera and have no intention to switch for a full frame, I suggest you to go for a 55-300mm, anyway... [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Lens help!
Top