Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Lens conundrum
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Geoffc" data-source="post: 213945" data-attributes="member: 8705"><p>The advice I would give if to forget about teleconvertors. They are not cheap and are only suitable for good fast glass.</p><p></p><p>The 70-300 is great (Including FX) and I understand the 55-300 is pretty good on DX. I've never used one but everybody seems to rave about the 18-105 which is cheap and would replace everything you have. A 35 mm 1.8g would finish it off for a low light prime. This keeps to 3 lenses as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Geoffc, post: 213945, member: 8705"] The advice I would give if to forget about teleconvertors. They are not cheap and are only suitable for good fast glass. The 70-300 is great (Including FX) and I understand the 55-300 is pretty good on DX. I've never used one but everybody seems to rave about the 18-105 which is cheap and would replace everything you have. A 35 mm 1.8g would finish it off for a low light prime. This keeps to 3 lenses as well. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Lens conundrum
Top
