Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Lens conundrum
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Watch72" data-source="post: 213923" data-attributes="member: 14003"><p>From the lens coverage point of view, it seems that the 28-80 could go.</p><p>If you are looking at a Macro - perhaps finding a 40mm or 60mm macro to replace your 50mm prime. I guess it will cost more and you need to top up. </p><p>I understand very well the difficulties and discipline needed to keep lens buying to a minimum.</p><p>Far too often we are seduced by great photos by others, raving reviews and the smooth marketing pitch by the camera companies. Good luck with your efforts but whatever outcome - put on those lens and go out and make good use of them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Watch72, post: 213923, member: 14003"] From the lens coverage point of view, it seems that the 28-80 could go. If you are looking at a Macro - perhaps finding a 40mm or 60mm macro to replace your 50mm prime. I guess it will cost more and you need to top up. I understand very well the difficulties and discipline needed to keep lens buying to a minimum. Far too often we are seduced by great photos by others, raving reviews and the smooth marketing pitch by the camera companies. Good luck with your efforts but whatever outcome - put on those lens and go out and make good use of them. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Lens conundrum
Top
