Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Lens conundrum
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SkvLTD" data-source="post: 213922" data-attributes="member: 12855"><p>Sell your 18-55 junker and 55-200. Heck, sell 50D too. Then get 35 1.8G and 70-300 VR if you want something with a reach and you'll be set.</p><p></p><p>28-80 has crappy aperture without a flash (in darker conditions), 18-55 is just beginner "junker" because it feels real cheap and doesn't offer superb quality, and 55-200 is like 18-55: beginner grade zoom.</p><p></p><p>35 1.8G is a solid, auto-focus prime with great aperture that's a true 35 field of view on DX (since its made for DX). 28-80 starts at ~40mm field of view, so its worse than the 35 prime. The 80 is ~120mm, but hardly as nifty as 75mm your 50mm ends up being. </p><p></p><p>70-300 VR is the BEST zoom before game goes pro and into $1500+, and is well worth the street pricing of 3-350. So your 50 is like a 75mm, and 70mm on this zoom is like a 105, which isn't too far off, but much more effective given its range.</p><p></p><p>If you're trying to do budget "trio" that's completely bang-for-buck, I'd do 35 f1.8G, whatever you own/want that's in 35-105 range, and then 70-300 VR.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SkvLTD, post: 213922, member: 12855"] Sell your 18-55 junker and 55-200. Heck, sell 50D too. Then get 35 1.8G and 70-300 VR if you want something with a reach and you'll be set. 28-80 has crappy aperture without a flash (in darker conditions), 18-55 is just beginner "junker" because it feels real cheap and doesn't offer superb quality, and 55-200 is like 18-55: beginner grade zoom. 35 1.8G is a solid, auto-focus prime with great aperture that's a true 35 field of view on DX (since its made for DX). 28-80 starts at ~40mm field of view, so its worse than the 35 prime. The 80 is ~120mm, but hardly as nifty as 75mm your 50mm ends up being. 70-300 VR is the BEST zoom before game goes pro and into $1500+, and is well worth the street pricing of 3-350. So your 50 is like a 75mm, and 70mm on this zoom is like a 105, which isn't too far off, but much more effective given its range. If you're trying to do budget "trio" that's completely bang-for-buck, I'd do 35 f1.8G, whatever you own/want that's in 35-105 range, and then 70-300 VR. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Lens conundrum
Top