Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Danno_RIP" data-source="post: 622526" data-attributes="member: 34269">When I saw that you had started this thread, Paul, I was not really surprised.&nbsp; Just by what you write I know you love both the Art Lenses and the Tamron. I have to say that since I would have to go for the G2.&nbsp; I am just getting used to the D700 I bought and I wish I could afford one.&nbsp; But, the Art lenses are running a close second.&nbsp; I read a review on Petepixal this week on the 135 and it was pretty impressive.&nbsp; I know this is a tough one.&nbsp; The thing for me is I do not always have the flexibility to zoom in or out with my feet.&nbsp; I just become too much of a distraction. I really use my Tamron non-vc 70-200 a lot, and I know that it has focus issues, but I still like it -&nbsp; It also convinced me that I need the G2 when I have the cash. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Danno_RIP, post: 622526, member: 34269"] When I saw that you had started this thread, Paul, I was not really surprised. Just by what you write I know you love both the Art Lenses and the Tamron. I have to say that since I would have to go for the G2. I am just getting used to the D700 I bought and I wish I could afford one. But, the Art lenses are running a close second. I read a review on Petepixal this week on the 135 and it was pretty impressive. I know this is a tough one. The thing for me is I do not always have the flexibility to zoom in or out with my feet. I just become too much of a distraction. I really use my Tamron non-vc 70-200 a lot, and I know that it has focus issues, but I still like it - It also convinced me that I need the G2 when I have the cash. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification