Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dayvurd" data-source="post: 560879" data-attributes="member: 40910">so i want to get a lens thats beter than my current one, i feel like im being held back by my stock lens in the photos i want to take when i go to places like the zoo or national parks and my lens just wont cut it.so im thinking of getting <a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0012UUP02/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&amp;colid=18ZD8HTASJY4T&amp;coliid=I31GM4DMMMXZ2G&amp;psc=1" target="_blank">Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro 1:2</a> - why i like this lens?. its got a far zoom, it has a macro option at a long distance, its fairly cheap also. BUT im also looking at <a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00RUBK53Y/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&amp;colid=18ZD8HTASJY4T&amp;coliid=I3HO1S1DQWQT6I" target="_blank">Nikon 20050 AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-200 mm VR II Lens</a> - why i like this lens? this is ofcourse a VR lens, but i loose 100m off the zoom and the macro feature. im just stuck on what would be better, what kind of shots id like to get, i feel if i went for the 200m VR lens i could still wont be able to get the shots i want. if i go for the 300mm lens will there be less quality in the shots?. for both lenses id be shooting with a tripod and handheld at full zoom and wide open, its pretty mixed bag of shots.Thoughts?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="dayvurd, post: 560879, member: 40910"] so i want to get a lens thats beter than my current one, i feel like im being held back by my stock lens in the photos i want to take when i go to places like the zoo or national parks and my lens just wont cut it. so im thinking of getting [URL="https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0012UUP02/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=18ZD8HTASJY4T&coliid=I31GM4DMMMXZ2G&psc=1"][COLOR=#111111][FONT=Arial]Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro 1:2[/FONT][/COLOR][/URL] - why i like this lens?. its got a far zoom, it has a macro option at a long distance, its fairly cheap also. BUT im also looking at [COLOR=#111111][FONT=Arial][URL="https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00RUBK53Y/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=18ZD8HTASJY4T&coliid=I3HO1S1DQWQT6I"]Nikon 20050 AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-200 mm VR II Lens[/URL] - why i like this lens?[/FONT][/COLOR] this is ofcourse a VR lens, but i loose 100m off the zoom and the macro feature. im just stuck on what would be better, what kind of shots id like to get, i feel if i went for the 200m VR lens i could still wont be able to get the shots i want. if i go for the 300mm lens will there be less quality in the shots?. for both lenses id be shooting with a tripod and handheld at full zoom and wide open, its pretty mixed bag of shots. Thoughts? [/QUOTE]

Verification