Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mathom33" data-source="post: 299066" data-attributes="member: 22304">Aside from the amount if memory needed to shoot a wedding, is there a reason they shoot jpeg? iWork's think that raw would give you more dynamic range and allow you to recover details in shadows that you normally couldn't pull with a jpeg.   And I definitely understand your proverb. The thing for her was that for the secluded location she chose for her venue left her with a handful of photographers in the area/willing to travel to that area. Other photographers were quoting her over $8000 for two shooters and 6 hours. I told her our brother and I would do it for free, but we're both part if the wedding party so it would make it a little difficult. I'm sure the priest wouldn't care for two groomsmen with dslr's acting like paparazzi.</blockquote>