Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Lazy wedding photographer, or standard practice?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mathom33" data-source="post: 299027" data-attributes="member: 22304"><p>From his website I would say he's not an amateur. He definitely knows what he's doing with photos he has taken during the day. It's the night shots that were edited sloppily or left unedited because the tripod for his flash could be seen. </p><p> I do not know the terms of the contract being that I am on the other side of the country and our schedules conflict; getting in contact with my sister is damn near impossible! I texted her his copy of the photos along with a copy of mine and she didn't call me until 2 days later during my anatomy lecture. </p><p> I won't be adding any of his photos or links to his site because: 1) He might be a member of this forum 2) As you stated, they might be copies for "review" in which case it would be bad form to call someone out based on work they are not finished with 3) If he found out he might cancel close to the wedding day which would leave her scrambling to find someone. </p><p></p><p> Interesting technique to say the least. Why not just use a monopod to compensate for her shakes? Maybe getting enough rest and laying off the coffee would have helped her =)</p><p></p><p></p><p>According to my sister, it was just a dedicated camera flash which he had synced wirelessly to his camera and mounted on a tripod. So really nothing special about it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mathom33, post: 299027, member: 22304"] From his website I would say he's not an amateur. He definitely knows what he's doing with photos he has taken during the day. It's the night shots that were edited sloppily or left unedited because the tripod for his flash could be seen. I do not know the terms of the contract being that I am on the other side of the country and our schedules conflict; getting in contact with my sister is damn near impossible! I texted her his copy of the photos along with a copy of mine and she didn't call me until 2 days later during my anatomy lecture. I won't be adding any of his photos or links to his site because: 1) He might be a member of this forum 2) As you stated, they might be copies for "review" in which case it would be bad form to call someone out based on work they are not finished with 3) If he found out he might cancel close to the wedding day which would leave her scrambling to find someone. Interesting technique to say the least. Why not just use a monopod to compensate for her shakes? Maybe getting enough rest and laying off the coffee would have helped her =) According to my sister, it was just a dedicated camera flash which he had synced wirelessly to his camera and mounted on a tripod. So really nothing special about it. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Lazy wedding photographer, or standard practice?
Top