Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dramtastic" data-source="post: 233949" data-attributes="member: 16805"><p>I've never been to a photography course so the only time I hear about photography 'rules' are from people who have, or, people who haven't and read forums and then think these rules are gospel. I never even looked at WUD's examples and started analysing them from a technical point of view. Guess I'm not really much of an anorak when it comes to photography. My connection to images is mostly visceral. WUD's shots expressed a mood for me, maybe not the one she was trying to portray, never the less I felt something, a certain stark beauty with a touch of melancholy. Keep shooting the way you like WUD, your style is unique. Hope everyone else does the same, well, within the rules. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="dramtastic, post: 233949, member: 16805"] I've never been to a photography course so the only time I hear about photography 'rules' are from people who have, or, people who haven't and read forums and then think these rules are gospel. I never even looked at WUD's examples and started analysing them from a technical point of view. Guess I'm not really much of an anorak when it comes to photography. My connection to images is mostly visceral. WUD's shots expressed a mood for me, maybe not the one she was trying to portray, never the less I felt something, a certain stark beauty with a touch of melancholy. Keep shooting the way you like WUD, your style is unique. Hope everyone else does the same, well, within the rules. ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification