Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Landscape lens
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marcel" data-source="post: 85014" data-attributes="member: 3903"><p>The 16-35 is quite a nice lens. It does have some distortion but that can be taken care off with post processing. But it's a great "one lens" solution for landscape. For night shots, it has VR and there's always the mono-tripod solution.</p><p></p><p>Your only other solution would be older lenses 20+28+35 lenses. Most of these are 2.8 but if you put them side by side with the newest 16-35, I "think" (tongue in cheek) the 16-35 has better IQ.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marcel, post: 85014, member: 3903"] The 16-35 is quite a nice lens. It does have some distortion but that can be taken care off with post processing. But it's a great "one lens" solution for landscape. For night shots, it has VR and there's always the mono-tripod solution. Your only other solution would be older lenses 20+28+35 lenses. Most of these are 2.8 but if you put them side by side with the newest 16-35, I "think" (tongue in cheek) the 16-35 has better IQ. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Landscape lens
Top