Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7000
Kit lens - How useful it is?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 127146" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>Again, a couple of subjective opinions discussing a pair of "cheap" kit lenses. My take away from both of these isn't so much that one is "better" as much as the 18-105mm isn't worth spending the extra money for. </p><p></p><p>I look at the image comparisons in the site I linked and yes, the 18-55mm is sharper in the corners at 18mm, but only at apertures above f8. Below that you're dealing with a softer lens, albeit with less CA, than the 18-105. The 18-55 seems to perform better at 35mm (it should - it's the lens' sweet spot), but falls off again. </p><p></p><p>"Pop" is not something I can measure. I've had the same lens "Pop" in certain lighting situations and fall flat in others, so without images to back up the words I can take it as informed input to help me make a buying decision, but as nothing that would ever lead me to believe one was "better". </p><p></p><p>Different horses for different races, and both are more than "good enough" to be first lenses for people. But there's nothing I've ever <em><strong>seen</strong></em> that's led me to believe that the 18-55mm is "better".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 127146, member: 9240"] Again, a couple of subjective opinions discussing a pair of "cheap" kit lenses. My take away from both of these isn't so much that one is "better" as much as the 18-105mm isn't worth spending the extra money for. I look at the image comparisons in the site I linked and yes, the 18-55mm is sharper in the corners at 18mm, but only at apertures above f8. Below that you're dealing with a softer lens, albeit with less CA, than the 18-105. The 18-55 seems to perform better at 35mm (it should - it's the lens' sweet spot), but falls off again. "Pop" is not something I can measure. I've had the same lens "Pop" in certain lighting situations and fall flat in others, so without images to back up the words I can take it as informed input to help me make a buying decision, but as nothing that would ever lead me to believe one was "better". Different horses for different races, and both are more than "good enough" to be first lenses for people. But there's nothing I've ever [I][B]seen[/B][/I] that's led me to believe that the 18-55mm is "better". [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7000
Kit lens - How useful it is?
Top