Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Low Light & Night
King of Low Light
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Brian" data-source="post: 252226" data-attributes="member: 17621"><p>The Nikon Df performed better than the D4, even though both cameras have the same sensor. Some have attribute this to the slower read-out rate of the Df. Electronics emit RF, that gets translated to noise. Slowing down the electronics reduces noise. The other explanation could be that the Df has less packed into it than the D4. Less electronics, less noise to be picked up. Eliminating sources of noise is easier than isolating and shielding against it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Reading the Adorama article, it looks like a re-hash.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Brian, post: 252226, member: 17621"] The Nikon Df performed better than the D4, even though both cameras have the same sensor. Some have attribute this to the slower read-out rate of the Df. Electronics emit RF, that gets translated to noise. Slowing down the electronics reduces noise. The other explanation could be that the Df has less packed into it than the D4. Less electronics, less noise to be picked up. Eliminating sources of noise is easier than isolating and shielding against it. Reading the Adorama article, it looks like a re-hash. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Low Light & Night
King of Low Light
Top
