Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Other Photography Equipment
Kinda Disappointed in Lexar 600x
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fortkentdad" data-source="post: 322619" data-attributes="member: 24285"><p>Decided to do some "real world" comparison testing. Using the same set of images - this lot was about 5GB 134 files. </p><p></p><p>Started with my Kingston Class 10 It is much slower. </p><p></p><p>Hard disk to Card was about 11MB/s for the Class 10 and about 33MB/s for both the Lexar Pro and the ScanDisk Extreme. </p><p></p><p>The real test was from the SD to the HD</p><p></p><p>Class 10 was slowest at just under 30 MB/sec - but look at that big hump of fast transfer in the beginning - ??? </p><p>[ATTACH]96752[/ATTACH]+</p><p></p><p>Then the ScanDisk Extreme at about 49 (it has been consistent at that level)</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]96753[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>But wonder of wonders I retested the Lexar so that I could compare using the same set of files. And look</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]96754[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>What to make of that? </p><p></p><p>Clearly the Lexar Pro is a faster disk. </p><p></p><p>Now my Class 10 is 32GB, ScanDisk is 16, For my second disk in my D610 do I want more capacity and use the 32GB of Class 10 or go for speed and use the ScanDisk? I suppose since my backup slot is for emergency over run I should use the 32GB eh? </p><p></p><p>David</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fortkentdad, post: 322619, member: 24285"] Decided to do some "real world" comparison testing. Using the same set of images - this lot was about 5GB 134 files. Started with my Kingston Class 10 It is much slower. Hard disk to Card was about 11MB/s for the Class 10 and about 33MB/s for both the Lexar Pro and the ScanDisk Extreme. The real test was from the SD to the HD Class 10 was slowest at just under 30 MB/sec - but look at that big hump of fast transfer in the beginning - ??? [ATTACH=CONFIG]96752._xfImport[/ATTACH]+ Then the ScanDisk Extreme at about 49 (it has been consistent at that level) [ATTACH=CONFIG]96753._xfImport[/ATTACH] But wonder of wonders I retested the Lexar so that I could compare using the same set of files. And look [ATTACH=CONFIG]96754._xfImport[/ATTACH] What to make of that? Clearly the Lexar Pro is a faster disk. Now my Class 10 is 32GB, ScanDisk is 16, For my second disk in my D610 do I want more capacity and use the 32GB of Class 10 or go for speed and use the ScanDisk? I suppose since my backup slot is for emergency over run I should use the 32GB eh? David [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Other Photography Equipment
Kinda Disappointed in Lexar 600x
Top