Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Other Photography Equipment
Kinda Disappointed in Lexar 600x
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fortkentdad" data-source="post: 322586" data-attributes="member: 24285"><p>I was writing to a Seagate SATA III Harddrive - it is on a 6GB/s SATA port on my motherboard which supports much faster data transfer than the USB 3.0 and SD card hard to imagine the bottleneck is on the PC side. </p><p></p><p>I am curious about that initial burst speed and perhaps they measure these things by averaging the burst speed at the beginning with the rest - but that burst only lasts for a short time. </p><p></p><p>It was only 7 GB transfer on a 64GB card or about 10% of the capacity, if it can only manage to transfer less than 10% of its capacity at the advertised speed that's odd - and again my ScanDisk never displayed this sort of transfer speed variance. </p><p></p><p>I'll do a couple more tests and try to learn a little more about how they measure these things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fortkentdad, post: 322586, member: 24285"] I was writing to a Seagate SATA III Harddrive - it is on a 6GB/s SATA port on my motherboard which supports much faster data transfer than the USB 3.0 and SD card hard to imagine the bottleneck is on the PC side. I am curious about that initial burst speed and perhaps they measure these things by averaging the burst speed at the beginning with the rest - but that burst only lasts for a short time. It was only 7 GB transfer on a 64GB card or about 10% of the capacity, if it can only manage to transfer less than 10% of its capacity at the advertised speed that's odd - and again my ScanDisk never displayed this sort of transfer speed variance. I'll do a couple more tests and try to learn a little more about how they measure these things. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Other Photography Equipment
Kinda Disappointed in Lexar 600x
Top
