Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Keep the 55-200?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KWJams" data-source="post: 20662" data-attributes="member: 1926"><p>I own the 55-200mm and wanted something with a longer reach and bought the 55-300mm and was at first very disapointed.</p><p> </p><p>The first thing I did when getting it was buy a cheap UV & a CPL filter on eBay. I have the same filters (different brand) for my 200mm lens and thought it would be a logical combination for the 300mm as well.</p><p> </p><p>In cold weather it was real slow focusing. The pictures were not as crisp ---- and then I started thinking about what possibly could be the problem since everyone else was raving about theirs.</p><p> </p><p>I have to go back to the start in my evaluation now since I realized that the CPL filter was causing the problems and not the lens. </p><p> </p><p>Here is an example of a shot I took a week ago that is not really spectacular and needs more contrast, but it was a quick point and shoot situation before the duck flew off and the lens did a great job in spite of me. </p><p> </p><p><img src="http://nikonites.com/gallery/files/1/9/2/6/duck_on_a_stump2_thumb.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KWJams, post: 20662, member: 1926"] I own the 55-200mm and wanted something with a longer reach and bought the 55-300mm and was at first very disapointed. The first thing I did when getting it was buy a cheap UV & a CPL filter on eBay. I have the same filters (different brand) for my 200mm lens and thought it would be a logical combination for the 300mm as well. In cold weather it was real slow focusing. The pictures were not as crisp ---- and then I started thinking about what possibly could be the problem since everyone else was raving about theirs. I have to go back to the start in my evaluation now since I realized that the CPL filter was causing the problems and not the lens. Here is an example of a shot I took a week ago that is not really spectacular and needs more contrast, but it was a quick point and shoot situation before the duck flew off and the lens did a great job in spite of me. [IMG]http://nikonites.com/gallery/files/1/9/2/6/duck_on_a_stump2_thumb.png[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Keep the 55-200?
Top