Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Just sprung for the the 70-200mm f4
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Disorderly" data-source="post: 176286" data-attributes="member: 10297"><p>I've had the 70-200mm F/2.8 for ages. I hardly ever use it; it's too heavy for me to handhold for very long, and too big to fit in my camera bag. I got the F/4 recently and love it. The image quality is amazing, it's narrow enough to fit in my bag, and it weighs barely more than the 24-70mm F/2.8 I use most of the time. It's a compromise, I know, but one I'm very happy with.</p><p></p><p>One difference between the F/4 and the F/2.8 is in efficiency. As an experiment I tried shooting the same setup with both lenses, as well as the 85mm F/1.8. At 85mm and F/4, the 2.8 was about 1/3 stop brighter than the 4, and the 85mm was about 1/3 stop brighter than that. Not surprised that a prime suffers less light loss than a zoom (I'd seen the same thing when I switch to the 105mm), but wasn't expecting so great a difference between two zooms.</p><p></p><p>I've heard it said that the best camera is the one you have with you. By that measure, the F/4 beats the F/2.8 most every time. It's the one I have with me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Disorderly, post: 176286, member: 10297"] I've had the 70-200mm F/2.8 for ages. I hardly ever use it; it's too heavy for me to handhold for very long, and too big to fit in my camera bag. I got the F/4 recently and love it. The image quality is amazing, it's narrow enough to fit in my bag, and it weighs barely more than the 24-70mm F/2.8 I use most of the time. It's a compromise, I know, but one I'm very happy with. One difference between the F/4 and the F/2.8 is in efficiency. As an experiment I tried shooting the same setup with both lenses, as well as the 85mm F/1.8. At 85mm and F/4, the 2.8 was about 1/3 stop brighter than the 4, and the 85mm was about 1/3 stop brighter than that. Not surprised that a prime suffers less light loss than a zoom (I'd seen the same thing when I switch to the 105mm), but wasn't expecting so great a difference between two zooms. I've heard it said that the best camera is the one you have with you. By that measure, the F/4 beats the F/2.8 most every time. It's the one I have with me. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Just sprung for the the 70-200mm f4
Top