Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Japanese Camera Makers Fight Against Smartphone Users -- (NY Times Article)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 239198" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>"... buyers put connectivity above picture quality."</p><p></p><p>Shocking revelation that most people are *NOT* photographers and want to use a device they already have on them to do something like take snapshots for sharing on social media. I mean, wow, I'm floored by this. Totally floored. [Insert Massive Eye Rolling, HERE]</p><p></p><p>There are photographers and there are snap-shot takers and the latter don't give a flying rat's a-- about white balance or RAW vs JPG or chromatic aberration; they want the convenience of using a portable device they already tote around with them 24/7 to do something fun with. Photography for most <strong>is just something fun to do</strong>. Fun. That's IT, that's where it ends. And it's not a big deal to them if they don't have print-worthy resolution, tack sharp images and perfect color balance because that interferes with the spontaneity which, to them, is very important because of the whole FUN factor. </p><p></p><p>It seems to me mirrorless cameras are great for photographers who, for whatever reason, need a small form factor but don't want to sacrifice image quality. If the Big Players thought mirrorless was going to carve deeply into the cellphone snapshot-shooter crowd I'm not surprised to hear their hopes are dashing against the rocks because it seems clear to me they misread their target demographic.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #FFFFFF">.....</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 239198, member: 13090"] "... buyers put connectivity above picture quality." Shocking revelation that most people are *NOT* photographers and want to use a device they already have on them to do something like take snapshots for sharing on social media. I mean, wow, I'm floored by this. Totally floored. [Insert Massive Eye Rolling, HERE] There are photographers and there are snap-shot takers and the latter don't give a flying rat's a-- about white balance or RAW vs JPG or chromatic aberration; they want the convenience of using a portable device they already tote around with them 24/7 to do something fun with. Photography for most [B]is just something fun to do[/B]. Fun. That's IT, that's where it ends. And it's not a big deal to them if they don't have print-worthy resolution, tack sharp images and perfect color balance because that interferes with the spontaneity which, to them, is very important because of the whole FUN factor. It seems to me mirrorless cameras are great for photographers who, for whatever reason, need a small form factor but don't want to sacrifice image quality. If the Big Players thought mirrorless was going to carve deeply into the cellphone snapshot-shooter crowd I'm not surprised to hear their hopes are dashing against the rocks because it seems clear to me they misread their target demographic. [COLOR="#FFFFFF"].....[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Japanese Camera Makers Fight Against Smartphone Users -- (NY Times Article)
Top