Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Project 365 & Daily Photos
Jake's Backdoor Hippie-palooza, 2014 Edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 385283" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>I didn't think you were, but I wanted to be clear that the concept of a self portrait is a long-standing one that has much less to do with the pure narcissism exhibited in the "selfie". Sure, it can be argued that any time one decides to capture a permanent representation of themselves that there is some degree of vanity and narcissism involved, a self portrait - for me at least - differs from the selfie in that, 1) its purpose is to invoke some meaning or emotion other than "look at me!!", and 2) more time was spent snapping the image than spent thinking about taking it. </p><p></p><p>Van Gogh and DaVinci <em>never</em> did selfies, in fact, I'd say it's near impossible to paint one (see rule #2). And while I suspect there were occasional selfies taken in the film days (I recall taking quite a few at weddings where a disposable camera was placed on every table), it wasn't until a camera lived in your pocket 24x7 that the real selfie was born. Not that you can't take a self portrait with a camera phone, or a selfie with a DSLR...</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]126453[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>...but considering them as synonyms does a disservice to all those for whom portraiture is a serious study, and for whom lighting means something other than bathroom fluorescents.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 385283, member: 9240"] I didn't think you were, but I wanted to be clear that the concept of a self portrait is a long-standing one that has much less to do with the pure narcissism exhibited in the "selfie". Sure, it can be argued that any time one decides to capture a permanent representation of themselves that there is some degree of vanity and narcissism involved, a self portrait - for me at least - differs from the selfie in that, 1) its purpose is to invoke some meaning or emotion other than "look at me!!", and 2) more time was spent snapping the image than spent thinking about taking it. Van Gogh and DaVinci [I]never[/I] did selfies, in fact, I'd say it's near impossible to paint one (see rule #2). And while I suspect there were occasional selfies taken in the film days (I recall taking quite a few at weddings where a disposable camera was placed on every table), it wasn't until a camera lived in your pocket 24x7 that the real selfie was born. Not that you can't take a self portrait with a camera phone, or a selfie with a DSLR... [ATTACH=CONFIG]126453._xfImport[/ATTACH] ...but considering them as synonyms does a disservice to all those for whom portraiture is a serious study, and for whom lighting means something other than bathroom fluorescents. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Project 365 & Daily Photos
Jake's Backdoor Hippie-palooza, 2014 Edition
Top