Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Pierro" data-source="post: 113817" data-attributes="member: 8517">Just a silly experiment, as I have always read that the native ISO is always best, as the DR of the sensor has been calibrated for native ISO.Since I have Lo 1.0&nbsp; ( ISO 100) then&nbsp; Lo 0.7 and Lo 0.3 , i've used those 3 and shot all the way through upto 1600. This isnt about&nbsp; the D300,&nbsp; so its not in the D300 forum, its just about any camera that has non native ISO valuesI cant call this real world shooting by any means,&nbsp; and not to be taken toooooooooo&nbsp; seriously, but I was a little surprised out how well the non native ISO settings performed.This could of course all change outside ( and probably will )&nbsp; where the dynamic range differs and would be more extreme at each end of the DR scale, but just for now,&nbsp; I thought I'd post some sillyness&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool&nbsp; &nbsp; :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" />Zero PP on all, just converted to .jpg then cropped to retain as big a file as possible. I have kept in a little background rather than crop right round the subject, because IMO when going for higher ISO, its more evident in the background than it is in the subject, so the differences can be seen clearly.ISO Lo-1.0 / Lo-.07 / Lo.03 / 200 / 250 / 320 / 400 / 500 / 640 / 800 / 1000 / 1250 / 1600[ATTACH]27061[/ATTACH][ATTACH]27062[/ATTACH][ATTACH]27063[/ATTACH][ATTACH]27064[/ATTACH][ATTACH]27065[/ATTACH][ATTACH]27066[/ATTACH][ATTACH]27067[/ATTACH][ATTACH]27068[/ATTACH][ATTACH]27069[/ATTACH][ATTACH]27070[/ATTACH][ATTACH]27071[/ATTACH][ATTACH]27072[/ATTACH][ATTACH]27073[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Pierro, post: 113817, member: 8517"] Just a silly experiment, as I have always read that the native ISO is always best, as the DR of the sensor has been calibrated for native ISO. Since I have Lo 1.0 ( ISO 100) then Lo 0.7 and Lo 0.3 , i've used those 3 and shot all the way through upto 1600. This isnt about the D300, so its not in the D300 forum, its just about any camera that has non native ISO values I cant call this real world shooting by any means, and not to be taken toooooooooo seriously, but I was a little surprised out how well the non native ISO settings performed. This could of course all change outside ( and probably will ) where the dynamic range differs and would be more extreme at each end of the DR scale, but just for now, I thought I'd post some sillyness :cool: Zero PP on all, just converted to .jpg then cropped to retain as big a file as possible. I have kept in a little background rather than crop right round the subject, because IMO when going for higher ISO, its more evident in the background than it is in the subject, so the differences can be seen clearly. ISO Lo-1.0 / Lo-.07 / Lo.03 / 200 / 250 / 320 / 400 / 500 / 640 / 800 / 1000 / 1250 / 1600 [ATTACH=CONFIG]27061._xfImport[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]27062._xfImport[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]27063._xfImport[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]27064._xfImport[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]27065._xfImport[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]27066._xfImport[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]27067._xfImport[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]27068._xfImport[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]27069._xfImport[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]27070._xfImport[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]27071._xfImport[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]27072._xfImport[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]27073._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification