Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
ISO is totally FAKE
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 693596" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>While I don't know if manufacturers fudge the numbers or not, I long ago came to the understanding that ISO is not part of exposure (only aperture and shutter speed do that), that digital noise is not the same thing as (film) grain but rather a side effect of the SNR and so forth. This of course upends the whole "Exposure Triangle" paradigm/apple cart, however, which in turn tends to upset many people in photography circles (based on my experience, anyway) in general so I've quit talking about it. </p><p></p><p>I agree wholeheartedly what is now being called ISO should be rebranded as "Gain" because 1) it's the far more accurate term and, 2) gain can be measured objectively and thusly could be standardized absolutely.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 693596, member: 13090"] While I don't know if manufacturers fudge the numbers or not, I long ago came to the understanding that ISO is not part of exposure (only aperture and shutter speed do that), that digital noise is not the same thing as (film) grain but rather a side effect of the SNR and so forth. This of course upends the whole "Exposure Triangle" paradigm/apple cart, however, which in turn tends to upset many people in photography circles (based on my experience, anyway) in general so I've quit talking about it. I agree wholeheartedly what is now being called ISO should be rebranded as "Gain" because 1) it's the far more accurate term and, 2) gain can be measured objectively and thusly could be standardized absolutely. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
ISO is totally FAKE
Top