Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D5500
is this normal?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 631859" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>The histogram graphically reflects the tonal range of my shot and provides me the same type and degree of information regardless of how it's shaped. Even what appears to be a lack of information in the histogram is useful information. I agree the histogram is not necessarily good for evaluating exposure <em>as I (or you or anyone else) wants it in any particular shot</em> since "correct" exposure is entirely up to the photographer. "Correct" exposure for a polar bear in a snowbank is going to be very different than the "correct" exposure of a nighttime shot of a city skyline and the histograms will look very different for those two scenes. But it's not the job of the histogram to tell me what exposure is "correct"; the job of the histogram is to show me the amount of tones of various brightness levels in a particular image and too help determine if I have highlight-clipping or loss of shadow detail at specific exposure settings. I find that helpful information. Further, I can examine histograms for individual <em>color-channels</em> for that same information. If my histogram shows I'm consistently blowing out the highlights in, say for instance, the Red color-channel while I'm doing a shoot, I would find that helpful information as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 631859, member: 13090"] The histogram graphically reflects the tonal range of my shot and provides me the same type and degree of information regardless of how it's shaped. Even what appears to be a lack of information in the histogram is useful information. I agree the histogram is not necessarily good for evaluating exposure [I]as I (or you or anyone else) wants it in any particular shot[/I] since "correct" exposure is entirely up to the photographer. "Correct" exposure for a polar bear in a snowbank is going to be very different than the "correct" exposure of a nighttime shot of a city skyline and the histograms will look very different for those two scenes. But it's not the job of the histogram to tell me what exposure is "correct"; the job of the histogram is to show me the amount of tones of various brightness levels in a particular image and too help determine if I have highlight-clipping or loss of shadow detail at specific exposure settings. I find that helpful information. Further, I can examine histograms for individual [I]color-channels[/I] for that same information. If my histogram shows I'm consistently blowing out the highlights in, say for instance, the Red color-channel while I'm doing a shoot, I would find that helpful information as well. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D5500
is this normal?
Top