Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Is the Nikon 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR AF-S Lens a good "gateway" lens?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="searchlight" data-source="post: 350874" data-attributes="member: 30960"><p>I have somewhat of a similar issue.</p><p></p><p>I own a Nikon D5000 with the 18-55mm VR and found some of my images were soft.</p><p></p><p>My local camera guy suggested that if I want consistant sharpness, that I need to upgrade to a better lens like the Sigma 17-50 f2.8 or pro Nikon brand but in either case, I am looking at upwards of $400 to spend.</p><p></p><p>The next day, he called to tell me that someone traded a mint Nikon 24-85mm VR, and he would be willing to sell it to me for $250. Knowing that I was on a limited budget, he told me that being an FX lens, sharpness would be better, and consistant in the center on a DX body so it would be a step up from my 18-55mm VR kit lens. </p><p></p><p>So would you agree with his recommendation that one could consider it a budget lens step up, and the price was right?</p><p></p><p>I bought the lens, and it does seem sharper to me. As a non-pro, sharpness and color rendition is more obvious to me than chromatic aberration and distortion which I do not really look for in my photos. Any my D5000 can correct for the distortion.</p><p></p><p>Elsewhere, I have read that in using an FX lens on a DX body renders corner shaprness issues moot.</p><p></p><p>What do you think?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="searchlight, post: 350874, member: 30960"] I have somewhat of a similar issue. I own a Nikon D5000 with the 18-55mm VR and found some of my images were soft. My local camera guy suggested that if I want consistant sharpness, that I need to upgrade to a better lens like the Sigma 17-50 f2.8 or pro Nikon brand but in either case, I am looking at upwards of $400 to spend. The next day, he called to tell me that someone traded a mint Nikon 24-85mm VR, and he would be willing to sell it to me for $250. Knowing that I was on a limited budget, he told me that being an FX lens, sharpness would be better, and consistant in the center on a DX body so it would be a step up from my 18-55mm VR kit lens. So would you agree with his recommendation that one could consider it a budget lens step up, and the price was right? I bought the lens, and it does seem sharper to me. As a non-pro, sharpness and color rendition is more obvious to me than chromatic aberration and distortion which I do not really look for in my photos. Any my D5000 can correct for the distortion. Elsewhere, I have read that in using an FX lens on a DX body renders corner shaprness issues moot. What do you think? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Is the Nikon 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR AF-S Lens a good "gateway" lens?
Top