Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7000
is the d7000 still a "relevant" camera in 2013?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dennis Kussener" data-source="post: 232661" data-attributes="member: 16439"><p>The D7000 is still an awsome camera.</p><p>If you compare it with the D7100 than you won't actually see a difference as a beginner.</p><p></p><p>As of lenses its pure individual, but I like fast zooms, so to start with look at the 17-50 f.8 from sigma, don't bother the tamron version its a lot less sharp <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dennis Kussener, post: 232661, member: 16439"] The D7000 is still an awsome camera. If you compare it with the D7100 than you won't actually see a difference as a beginner. As of lenses its pure individual, but I like fast zooms, so to start with look at the 17-50 f.8 from sigma, don't bother the tamron version its a lot less sharp ;) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7000
is the d7000 still a "relevant" camera in 2013?
Top
