Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7000
is the d7000 still a "relevant" camera in 2013?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="superustipak" data-source="post: 232585" data-attributes="member: 18456"><p>You must understand that camera brands like Nikon and Canon will always make newer and newer cameras, up the megapixel amount, add a few bells and whistles, call it something else, and jack up the price.</p><p></p><p>The D7000 is basically the same thing as the D7100, with a few (to me) minor changes. I have not seen enough changes to warrant upgrading to the D7100. </p><p></p><p>To answer your question... Is it relevant? Heck Yes! Anyone that tells you it isn't is simply lying to you. You can get professional results with a D7000. It can do everything. I would say get a refurbished D7000 and spend the money you saved on a nice prime lens or a flash unit rather than getting the D7100 for example.</p><p></p><p>The price difference currently is ~ the cost of a SB-700. I would always rather have a D7k and the SB700 than the 7100 alone.</p><p></p><p>Lenses and lighting will make or break your pictures. If you can't get excellent results from the D7000, it's your fault - not the cameras.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="superustipak, post: 232585, member: 18456"] You must understand that camera brands like Nikon and Canon will always make newer and newer cameras, up the megapixel amount, add a few bells and whistles, call it something else, and jack up the price. The D7000 is basically the same thing as the D7100, with a few (to me) minor changes. I have not seen enough changes to warrant upgrading to the D7100. To answer your question... Is it relevant? Heck Yes! Anyone that tells you it isn't is simply lying to you. You can get professional results with a D7000. It can do everything. I would say get a refurbished D7000 and spend the money you saved on a nice prime lens or a flash unit rather than getting the D7100 for example. The price difference currently is ~ the cost of a SB-700. I would always rather have a D7k and the SB700 than the 7100 alone. Lenses and lighting will make or break your pictures. If you can't get excellent results from the D7000, it's your fault - not the cameras. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7000
is the d7000 still a "relevant" camera in 2013?
Top