Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="eurotrash" data-source="post: 223841" data-attributes="member: 9237">I'd say it's still relevant. With 16.2 mpxl, a 100% viewfinder, multiple batty shooting modes, 'semi-pro' controls, the ability to use legacy lenses..I mean, the list just goes on and on. It's really one of those cameras that will go down in history as one of Nikon's proudest achievements, balancing power with weight, ingenuity with class and features with cost.The D7000 is truly one of those cameras that demands as much out of you as it does out of the glass in front of the sensor. We're not talking D800 territory here, but I do think that it's true to a large extent. The better glass i've put in front of it, the better the results are. (I of course, had something to do with that outcome, too. Well, maybe. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" />)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="eurotrash, post: 223841, member: 9237"] I'd say it's still relevant. With 16.2 mpxl, a 100% viewfinder, multiple batty shooting modes, 'semi-pro' controls, the ability to use legacy lenses..I mean, the list just goes on and on. It's really one of those cameras that will go down in history as one of Nikon's proudest achievements, balancing power with weight, ingenuity with class and features with cost. The D7000 is truly one of those cameras that demands as much out of you as it does out of the glass in front of the sensor. We're not talking D800 territory here, but I do think that it's true to a large extent. The better glass i've put in front of it, the better the results are. (I of course, had something to do with that outcome, too. Well, maybe. :P) [/QUOTE]

Verification