Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7000
is the d7000 still a "relevant" camera in 2013?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jenniferrb517" data-source="post: 223784" data-attributes="member: 18168"><p>Hi! New member here <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p>I am in the market for my first DSLR after a couple of years on a photography hiatus and am leaning heavily toward the D7000. I remember when the D90 came out and after borrowing one from a friend I determined that it was my dream camera...but that was almost 6 years ago. Now that I'm researching DSLRs again I am leaning toward the D7000. Though it doesn't quite have the same shiny tech specs as the newer D series models I think that it has a better build quality and lots of room for me to "grow into". I am not concerned about MP and HD video and would prefer to have a camera that feels more solid and professional in hand.</p><p></p><p>My only question is....is the D7000 still a relevant camera 3 years after its release? The D7100 is way out of budget at the moment, and I really feel that I would outgrow the newer D3200 or D5200 very quickly.</p><p></p><p>I'm also considering lenses, everyone seems to have a different opinion about what a first lens should be. Some people are certain that prime lenses are the way to go for beginners, others say that the kit lens is a good choice. I think I'm leaning towards a 50mm fixed lens, but I'm concerned about loosing the versatility of a zoom lens (18-105 kit lens)</p><p></p><p>Any thoughts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jenniferrb517, post: 223784, member: 18168"] Hi! New member here :) I am in the market for my first DSLR after a couple of years on a photography hiatus and am leaning heavily toward the D7000. I remember when the D90 came out and after borrowing one from a friend I determined that it was my dream camera...but that was almost 6 years ago. Now that I'm researching DSLRs again I am leaning toward the D7000. Though it doesn't quite have the same shiny tech specs as the newer D series models I think that it has a better build quality and lots of room for me to "grow into". I am not concerned about MP and HD video and would prefer to have a camera that feels more solid and professional in hand. My only question is....is the D7000 still a relevant camera 3 years after its release? The D7100 is way out of budget at the moment, and I really feel that I would outgrow the newer D3200 or D5200 very quickly. I'm also considering lenses, everyone seems to have a different opinion about what a first lens should be. Some people are certain that prime lenses are the way to go for beginners, others say that the kit lens is a good choice. I think I'm leaning towards a 50mm fixed lens, but I'm concerned about loosing the versatility of a zoom lens (18-105 kit lens) Any thoughts? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7000
is the d7000 still a "relevant" camera in 2013?
Top