Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Is it really worth it?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Krs_2007" data-source="post: 323850" data-attributes="member: 12948"><p>Exactly what Steve said. I have both the 2.8 and 4 versions of the 70-200 range and they are both fantastic, with the only difference being the extra stop the 2.8 gives you. There might be some other subtle differences but if you want a great lens without the extra stop and the extra cost look at the 70-200 f4. I bought the 2.8 for the extra stop and the ability to keep the aperture pretty low when using a teleconverter which with the 2.8 it makes the lens a 5.6, if you use the same TC on the f4 it becomes a f8.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Krs_2007, post: 323850, member: 12948"] Exactly what Steve said. I have both the 2.8 and 4 versions of the 70-200 range and they are both fantastic, with the only difference being the extra stop the 2.8 gives you. There might be some other subtle differences but if you want a great lens without the extra stop and the extra cost look at the 70-200 f4. I bought the 2.8 for the extra stop and the ability to keep the aperture pretty low when using a teleconverter which with the 2.8 it makes the lens a 5.6, if you use the same TC on the f4 it becomes a f8. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Is it really worth it?
Top