Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 119290" data-attributes="member: 9240">The D7000 was and still is the replacement for the D90.&nbsp; That's been Nikon's official position since the launch 2 years ago.&nbsp; What you're really waiting for is the D300 replacement.The D7100 is &quot;outfitted much better than the D600&quot;?!&nbsp; I have the D600 and would disagree 100%, if only because it's completely apples and oranges.&nbsp; The D7100 is essentially a DX version of the D600, but with a smaller buffer.&nbsp; Outside of the removal of the anti-aliasing filter there's nothing I would consider as even a potential improvement over the D600 technology.&nbsp; Perhaps you mean D300?<a href="http://nikonites.com/d7100/11410-d7100-buffer-size-will-fill-one-second.html" target="_blank">This is the thread</a> where I present specific information regarding the small buffer on the D7100.&nbsp; It's plain as day on the Nikon website, and the fact that it's nowhere to be found on the Nikon USA site is truly bothersome to me.&nbsp; Couple that with the marketing speak from Nikon USA about being the &quot;Flagship&quot; DX model which has since been disputed by Nikon Europe and I'm left feeling that the model is being way overhyped, and I have to wonder why?&nbsp; Would love to find out that the buffer information is wrong, but I would have expected that to have been disputed by now.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 119290, member: 9240"] The D7000 [B][I]was and still is[/I][/B] the replacement for the D90. That's been Nikon's official position since the launch 2 years ago. What you're really waiting for is the D300 replacement. The D7100 is "outfitted much better than the D600"?! I have the D600 and would disagree 100%, if only because it's completely apples and oranges. The D7100 is essentially a DX version of the D600, but with a smaller buffer. Outside of the removal of the anti-aliasing filter there's nothing I would consider as even a potential improvement over the D600 technology. Perhaps you mean D300? [URL="http://nikonites.com/d7100/11410-d7100-buffer-size-will-fill-one-second.html"]This is the thread[/URL] where I present specific information regarding the small buffer on the D7100. It's plain as day on the Nikon website, and the fact that it's nowhere to be found on the Nikon USA site is truly bothersome to me. Couple that with the marketing speak from Nikon USA about being the "Flagship" DX model which has since been disputed by Nikon Europe and I'm left feeling that the model is being way overhyped, and I have to wonder why? Would love to find out that the buffer information is wrong, but I would have expected that to have been disputed by now. [/QUOTE]

Verification