Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Macro
Is a macro lens better than extension tubes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="STM" data-source="post: 319732" data-attributes="member: 12827"><p>In most cases a macro/micro lens will perform better than say a "normal" lens and extension tubes for a few reasons:</p><p></p><p>1. Flatness of field. Macro/micro lenses are designed to provide better flatness of field than a normal, every day lens.</p><p>2. Close focus capability. Macro/micro lenses can be used for general photography as well but are usually optimized for close focus. The 55mm f/2.8 AIS Micro has "CRC" which stands for close range compensation. Internal elements shift a little to improve close focus quality</p><p>3. Adding extension tubes reduces the amount of light landing on the film/sensor by something called the inverse squared law. Using a combination of extension tubes to achieve a 1:2 will reduce light more than a Macro/Micro lens will for the same magnification.</p><p></p><p>Of all of the alternatives though, extension tubes are probably the best compromise if you don't have a macro/micro lens. Especially when compared to using a teleconverter or close up lenses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="STM, post: 319732, member: 12827"] In most cases a macro/micro lens will perform better than say a "normal" lens and extension tubes for a few reasons: 1. Flatness of field. Macro/micro lenses are designed to provide better flatness of field than a normal, every day lens. 2. Close focus capability. Macro/micro lenses can be used for general photography as well but are usually optimized for close focus. The 55mm f/2.8 AIS Micro has "CRC" which stands for close range compensation. Internal elements shift a little to improve close focus quality 3. Adding extension tubes reduces the amount of light landing on the film/sensor by something called the inverse squared law. Using a combination of extension tubes to achieve a 1:2 will reduce light more than a Macro/Micro lens will for the same magnification. Of all of the alternatives though, extension tubes are probably the best compromise if you don't have a macro/micro lens. Especially when compared to using a teleconverter or close up lenses. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Macro
Is a macro lens better than extension tubes
Top