Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Interesting take on More MP's and why it's valid
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 117656" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>I think there's what I'll call "purposeful downsizing", which would be the deliberate resizing of an image for printing to a specific size, and the automatic downsizing that you get with posting here. I would assume that the software used here is less careful with the sampling method used (when I resize in Lightroom I have 3 or 4 resampling methods). Either way, a smaller image should contain reduced noise regardless of the method, but some are better than others.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 117656, member: 9240"] I think there's what I'll call "purposeful downsizing", which would be the deliberate resizing of an image for printing to a specific size, and the automatic downsizing that you get with posting here. I would assume that the software used here is less careful with the sampling method used (when I resize in Lightroom I have 3 or 4 resampling methods). Either way, a smaller image should contain reduced noise regardless of the method, but some are better than others. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Interesting take on More MP's and why it's valid
Top
