Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 560062" data-attributes="member: 9240">&quot;Better&quot; results from an 850nm?&nbsp; No.&nbsp; Different results for sure.Take a look at this from the folks at KolariVision on <a href="http://kolarivision.com/articles/choosing-a-filter/" target="_blank">choosing a filter</a>.&nbsp; These are all done with converted cameras, but they do sell filters as well (yes, the &quot;expensive kind&quot;) and you can assume that the filter on the front will be similar - but remember, your sensor stack has some IR filtration built in, so you may lose some of the light/color. Also realize that the more light you filter out the longer an exposure you'll need, so putting an 850nm on the front of a lens may require prohibitively long exposures if you want everything crisp, because tree branches will move. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 560062, member: 9240"] "Better" results from an 850nm? No. Different results for sure. Take a look at this from the folks at KolariVision on [URL="http://kolarivision.com/articles/choosing-a-filter/"]choosing a filter[/URL]. These are all done with converted cameras, but they do sell filters as well (yes, the "expensive kind") and you can assume that the filter on the front will be [I]similar[/I] - but remember, your sensor stack has some IR filtration built in, so you may lose some of the light/color. Also realize that the more light you filter out the longer an exposure you'll need, so putting an 850nm on the front of a lens may require prohibitively long exposures if you want everything crisp, because tree branches [I]will[/I] move. ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification