Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Abstract
INFRARED - CWB on D70
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 284937" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>A lot of reasons, but primarily it's for compatibility with Adobe tools, across releases and other things. DNG's tend to be slightly smaller than their NEF counterparts as well. DaveW and I went into this in a lot more depth in another thread somewhere, but it's just something I've done since I got Lightroom. It's not necessarily "better", but it has the potential to save time and headaches down the road as RAW standards change. Here's a blog that summarizes it.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://photographyconcentrate.com/should-you-convert-dng/" target="_blank">Should You Convert Your Photos to DNG? | Photography Concentrate</a></p><p></p><p>It also raises the question of whether or not to convert JPEG to DNG. As a rule I would not make a habit of it, but I have a catalog of images taken with Point & Shoot cameras in Rocky Mountain Nat'l Park that I need to look at re-editing, and the idea of being able to apply non-destructive edits to the original files is something rather appealing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 284937, member: 9240"] A lot of reasons, but primarily it's for compatibility with Adobe tools, across releases and other things. DNG's tend to be slightly smaller than their NEF counterparts as well. DaveW and I went into this in a lot more depth in another thread somewhere, but it's just something I've done since I got Lightroom. It's not necessarily "better", but it has the potential to save time and headaches down the road as RAW standards change. Here's a blog that summarizes it. [url=http://photographyconcentrate.com/should-you-convert-dng/]Should You Convert Your Photos to DNG? | Photography Concentrate[/url] It also raises the question of whether or not to convert JPEG to DNG. As a rule I would not make a habit of it, but I have a catalog of images taken with Point & Shoot cameras in Rocky Mountain Nat'l Park that I need to look at re-editing, and the idea of being able to apply non-destructive edits to the original files is something rather appealing. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Abstract
INFRARED - CWB on D70
Top