Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Other Photography Equipment
Inexpensive Gimbal Head
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fortkentdad" data-source="post: 546210" data-attributes="member: 24285"><p>Tried my new Nikkor 200-500 on my Monopod with a Joby "X" ballhead and on my Benro Transfunctional Travel Angel with a B0 ballhead. </p><p></p><p>The Benro B0 seemed OK on the tripod but the Joby "X" was less than satisfactory (it is an less expensive $50 head). But it became apparent to me that I should consider a gimbal style head. </p><p></p><p>The 'load' rating for the ball heads is more than the 7 pounds of gear for that lens + a D610. The Benro set up is good for up to 17 pounds so well under the max - not even half the max. </p><p></p><p>By all accounts the consensus seems to be that the Wimberley WH-200 full gimbal is best but at $750 CDN (Henrys.com) it is more than I can bear to part with at the moment for a support. </p><p></p><p>The Jobu line seems interesting - from their "Micro Gimbal" attachment for a 'good' ballhead at $170 CDN (again at Henry's) I would probably upgrade my main ballhead on the tripod and move the B0 to the mono-pod. I'd have to allow for another $150 for a "good" ballhead eh? So $300+ for that one. </p><p></p><p>See: JOBU's website <a href="http://www.jobu-design.com/Jobu-Micro-GimbalBallhead-Adapter_p_15.html" target="_blank">Jobu Micro Gimbal/Ballhead Adapter</a> Interesting - Jobu is a Canadian Co. Didn't know that. </p><p></p><p>They also have a full Gimbal for about $400 called the Jobu Jr 3 - not as heavy duty as others but way more than I need with 7 pounds of gear. </p><p></p><p>I also looked at Monofrotto 393 Heavy Support which takes a different approach but comes in for about $350 CDN (Amazon.ca). </p><p></p><p>And the Wimberley Sidekick which again needs that 'good' ballhead for $350 (Vistek.ca) But it's a "Wimberley". </p><p></p><p>BUT THEN</p><p></p><p>I read with interest though the posts above. Seems some folk are happy with their less expensive gimbals </p><p></p><p>I had looked and dismissed the $100-$200 versions offered on Amazon.CA for units like Cowboy Studio, Beike, ZeleSouris, Newwer, Xsource, Optieka, Movo, and more. </p><p></p><p>Maybe I was too hasty. I feared putting such an expensive set up onto something that may fail and drop my gear. </p><p></p><p>Now I have even more to consider. </p><p></p><p>Not the least of which is whether I'll just live with hand held shooting.....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fortkentdad, post: 546210, member: 24285"] Tried my new Nikkor 200-500 on my Monopod with a Joby "X" ballhead and on my Benro Transfunctional Travel Angel with a B0 ballhead. The Benro B0 seemed OK on the tripod but the Joby "X" was less than satisfactory (it is an less expensive $50 head). But it became apparent to me that I should consider a gimbal style head. The 'load' rating for the ball heads is more than the 7 pounds of gear for that lens + a D610. The Benro set up is good for up to 17 pounds so well under the max - not even half the max. By all accounts the consensus seems to be that the Wimberley WH-200 full gimbal is best but at $750 CDN (Henrys.com) it is more than I can bear to part with at the moment for a support. The Jobu line seems interesting - from their "Micro Gimbal" attachment for a 'good' ballhead at $170 CDN (again at Henry's) I would probably upgrade my main ballhead on the tripod and move the B0 to the mono-pod. I'd have to allow for another $150 for a "good" ballhead eh? So $300+ for that one. See: JOBU's website [url=http://www.jobu-design.com/Jobu-Micro-GimbalBallhead-Adapter_p_15.html]Jobu Micro Gimbal/Ballhead Adapter[/url] Interesting - Jobu is a Canadian Co. Didn't know that. They also have a full Gimbal for about $400 called the Jobu Jr 3 - not as heavy duty as others but way more than I need with 7 pounds of gear. I also looked at Monofrotto 393 Heavy Support which takes a different approach but comes in for about $350 CDN (Amazon.ca). And the Wimberley Sidekick which again needs that 'good' ballhead for $350 (Vistek.ca) But it's a "Wimberley". BUT THEN I read with interest though the posts above. Seems some folk are happy with their less expensive gimbals I had looked and dismissed the $100-$200 versions offered on Amazon.CA for units like Cowboy Studio, Beike, ZeleSouris, Newwer, Xsource, Optieka, Movo, and more. Maybe I was too hasty. I feared putting such an expensive set up onto something that may fail and drop my gear. Now I have even more to consider. Not the least of which is whether I'll just live with hand held shooting..... [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Other Photography Equipment
Inexpensive Gimbal Head
Top