Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Pierro" data-source="post: 91507" data-attributes="member: 8517">Yup, its one that needs learning alright. It wont take you long <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Apart from the processing which has messed up the feather detail ( easily remedied on your next shot )&nbsp; the shot doesnt look too bad, but when viewing the bigger file, i notice that there is some softening , which i guess now you know is down to the f6.3 aperture used, as you have said you'll try upping that to f8.Here's 2 shots i took at f6.3 when i had my first Sig 150-500 OS, back when i used a Canon 450/Rebel ( hisssssssss - booooooo !!&nbsp; )&nbsp; Its not too bad for f6.3, and i was still getting to grips with the lens back then, but i have also owned another 150-500 OS&nbsp; with my D300. But you can see in those shots that the lens doesnt really like f6.3. It actually says f6.17 in the EXIF - weird</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Pierro, post: 91507, member: 8517"] Yup, its one that needs learning alright. It wont take you long :) Apart from the processing which has messed up the feather detail ( easily remedied on your next shot ) the shot doesnt look too bad, but when viewing the bigger file, i notice that there is some softening , which i guess now you know is down to the f6.3 aperture used, as you have said you'll try upping that to f8. Here's 2 shots i took at f6.3 when i had my first Sig 150-500 OS, back when i used a Canon 450/Rebel ( hisssssssss - booooooo !! ) Its not too bad for f6.3, and i was still getting to grips with the lens back then, but i have also owned another 150-500 OS with my D300. But you can see in those shots that the lens doesnt really like f6.3. It actually says f6.17 in the EXIF - weird [/QUOTE]

Verification