Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
In praise of out-of-camera JPGs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steve in Oz" data-source="post: 682844" data-attributes="member: 41182"><p>I've had a D7200 for about three years, totally love it. I've also done my fair share of RAW post-production.</p><p></p><p>Over the past few months though, I've been looking more closely at the the OOC JPG images coming out of the camera (mainly for clients who need images turned around in a hurry) - and I never realised how good they are.</p><p></p><p>I think some of us are too quick to damn the ever-present and ubiquitous JPG. I'm convinced now it's 'horses for courses'. I shoot both RAW and JPG so I have access to either type of file.</p><p></p><p>I use settings I got from this forum:</p><p></p><p>Vivid, Sharpening 7, Clarity 2, Contrast 1, Brightness .25, Saturation .75, Hue 0.0.</p><p></p><p>Anyone else with suggestions for getting good JPGs I'd be happy to hear from.</p><p></p><p>And before anyone tells me I should be shooting RAW - I do - when time permits! </p><p></p><p>But when a client brings a laptop and a thumb drive to the location and asks for images for his FB page within half an hour...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steve in Oz, post: 682844, member: 41182"] I've had a D7200 for about three years, totally love it. I've also done my fair share of RAW post-production. Over the past few months though, I've been looking more closely at the the OOC JPG images coming out of the camera (mainly for clients who need images turned around in a hurry) - and I never realised how good they are. I think some of us are too quick to damn the ever-present and ubiquitous JPG. I'm convinced now it's 'horses for courses'. I shoot both RAW and JPG so I have access to either type of file. I use settings I got from this forum: Vivid, Sharpening 7, Clarity 2, Contrast 1, Brightness .25, Saturation .75, Hue 0.0. Anyone else with suggestions for getting good JPGs I'd be happy to hear from. And before anyone tells me I should be shooting RAW - I do - when time permits! But when a client brings a laptop and a thumb drive to the location and asks for images for his FB page within half an hour... [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
In praise of out-of-camera JPGs
Top
