Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
In doubt between f2.8 and f.4(+)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 594624" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>As a parting shot I'll just point out that I'd much, MUCH rather have <em>better</em> lenses even if that means having fewer of them. Outstanding glass is expensive for a lot of very good reasons but I can tell you for a fact really outstanding glass brings out the full potential of the camera body it's attached to and, simply put, is a joy to work with. I've never regretted holding out and getting what I know I really want. There have been times I've settled for less and if I haven't regretted it outright, neither had the "itch been scratched". Oh, sure I saved some money by getting something less than what I really wanted, but I was always wondering what I was missing; and that kind of thinking can really suck the joy out of owning a new lens. Trouble is, at that point the problem is compounded by the fact I've already spent a hefty amount on something I didn't really want, so getting what I really do want now seems doubly silly because the first thing I think is how that money might have gone toward the lens I really wanted in the first place. But of course I also understand there are limits to this... I'd like to be driving a Mercedes, but my Nissan will have to suffice. </p><p></p><p>In short, when it comes to glass: Don't buy based on how a good a deal you think you're getting; buy the absolute <strong>best</strong> you can afford. "Buy once, cry once."</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #FFFFFF">.....</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 594624, member: 13090"] As a parting shot I'll just point out that I'd much, MUCH rather have [I]better[/I] lenses even if that means having fewer of them. Outstanding glass is expensive for a lot of very good reasons but I can tell you for a fact really outstanding glass brings out the full potential of the camera body it's attached to and, simply put, is a joy to work with. I've never regretted holding out and getting what I know I really want. There have been times I've settled for less and if I haven't regretted it outright, neither had the "itch been scratched". Oh, sure I saved some money by getting something less than what I really wanted, but I was always wondering what I was missing; and that kind of thinking can really suck the joy out of owning a new lens. Trouble is, at that point the problem is compounded by the fact I've already spent a hefty amount on something I didn't really want, so getting what I really do want now seems doubly silly because the first thing I think is how that money might have gone toward the lens I really wanted in the first place. But of course I also understand there are limits to this... I'd like to be driving a Mercedes, but my Nissan will have to suffice. In short, when it comes to glass: Don't buy based on how a good a deal you think you're getting; buy the absolute [B]best[/B] you can afford. "Buy once, cry once." [COLOR="#FFFFFF"].....[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
In doubt between f2.8 and f.4(+)
Top