Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
In doubt between f2.8 and f.4(+)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tijs" data-source="post: 594610" data-attributes="member: 42516"><p>Wow, thanks you all for informative and passionate responses. </p><p>Of course I pretty much could have guessed what you were all going to write, but still, because it's quite a big expense I want to take all into consideration. I think my biggest concern was/is, will the cheapest f2.8 lens still be worth the big difference in cost compared to the f4 and f5.6 counterparts. </p><p>According to Horoscope Fish it certainly is <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> I indeed did read your other comments about the tamron 70-200 and how you like to hug it, haha. It almost immediately made me buy one, but I wanted to be absolutely sure. </p><p></p><p>Horoscope Fish, I see you have the VR version, which is actually twice as pricy as the one without. (about €1350 compared to €700). But the VR version also seems to have a better built, like more elements, more quiete focussing motor, etc.</p><p></p><p>Camera Fun and Danno, which of the two versions do you guys ended up with?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tijs, post: 594610, member: 42516"] Wow, thanks you all for informative and passionate responses. Of course I pretty much could have guessed what you were all going to write, but still, because it's quite a big expense I want to take all into consideration. I think my biggest concern was/is, will the cheapest f2.8 lens still be worth the big difference in cost compared to the f4 and f5.6 counterparts. According to Horoscope Fish it certainly is :) I indeed did read your other comments about the tamron 70-200 and how you like to hug it, haha. It almost immediately made me buy one, but I wanted to be absolutely sure. Horoscope Fish, I see you have the VR version, which is actually twice as pricy as the one without. (about €1350 compared to €700). But the VR version also seems to have a better built, like more elements, more quiete focussing motor, etc. Camera Fun and Danno, which of the two versions do you guys ended up with? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
In doubt between f2.8 and f.4(+)
Top