Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
In doubt between f2.8 and f.4(+)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jay_dean" data-source="post: 594599" data-attributes="member: 34040"><p>If, for example you take a Nikon 300mm f/4 and compare it to a Nikon 300mm f/2.8 there is a huge price difference, and on paper for what? one stop and a bit of dof, for the same focal length? Many modern cameras can handle one stop difference, so the f/4 looks like a bargain at few hundred over several thousand (£'s/$'s Euros..whatever.)</p><p>That several thousand difference is basically down to two factors. Build and performance. If you place them side by side the first difference is size. The f/4 is compact, and lightweight, the f/2.8 is a good twice the size and much much heavier, due to larger glass elements, better case and add to that waterproof over the f/4 being water resistant. The f/2.8 has a professional build to do a professional job (if need be)</p><p>Secondly is performance. The f2.8 is much faster and optically superior, which to many people is a crucial part of their photography.</p><p>So, there is a bit more to it than just one stop and a bit o' dof. Its just is the expense worth it to you?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jay_dean, post: 594599, member: 34040"] If, for example you take a Nikon 300mm f/4 and compare it to a Nikon 300mm f/2.8 there is a huge price difference, and on paper for what? one stop and a bit of dof, for the same focal length? Many modern cameras can handle one stop difference, so the f/4 looks like a bargain at few hundred over several thousand (£'s/$'s Euros..whatever.) That several thousand difference is basically down to two factors. Build and performance. If you place them side by side the first difference is size. The f/4 is compact, and lightweight, the f/2.8 is a good twice the size and much much heavier, due to larger glass elements, better case and add to that waterproof over the f/4 being water resistant. The f/2.8 has a professional build to do a professional job (if need be) Secondly is performance. The f2.8 is much faster and optically superior, which to many people is a crucial part of their photography. So, there is a bit more to it than just one stop and a bit o' dof. Its just is the expense worth it to you? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
In doubt between f2.8 and f.4(+)
Top